Skip to content

pH

Sale price$15.00

Sample Type: Juice, Must, & Wine

Sample Volume: 50 mLs

Methodology: FTIR Spectroscopy

The Power of Hydrogen, or pH, is a measure of how acidic (<7) or basic (>7) a solution is on a logarithmic scale. It’s the most fundamental analysis in all of winemaking informing us of microbial inhibition, chemical speciation, and tartrate stability. 

At wine pH (~pH 3-4), there are no dangerous pathogens to human life, and this has largely shaped the traditions and legislature around winemaking. Since the risk of food born illness is very low, winemakers have far more leeway with winery sanitation than with other food products. Nevertheless, pH helps winemakers understand the proclivity of wine towards spoilage, thus giving them a framework for sanitary demand. Rather than thinking of sanitation as an absolute, we can discuss its relevance as a stylistic tool depending on varying pH values. Furthermore, pH also influences the speciation of chemicals in wine, most notably sulfur, phenolics, and metals, and their roles in antimicrobial and antioxidant activity.

The limits for cleaning and sanitation are well-defined:

Clean: removal of soil and 90% reduction of colony forming units.

Disinfection: a reduction of 99.9% of colony forming units.

Sanitation: a reduction of 99.999% colony forming units.

Sterilization: a reduction of 99.9999% colony forming units. Chemical sterilants include 0.2% peracetic acid (PAA) and 7.5% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Mohapatra, 2017).

As a biological transformation, winemaking exists within a grey area of the this spectrum. Ultimately, the level of cleanliness in a winery is subject to a winemaker’s microbiome of desire. For instance, premium Cabernet Sauvignon producers with high pHs tend to have immaculate cellars with strict sanitation and risk adverse protocols like inoculating with cultivated yeast, whereas small lot Pinot Noir producers tend to take more risks with spontaneous fermentations in porous vessels with less sulfur. How we determine the design and practices for each wine style will be based on sanitary demand, the primary function of pH. It is important to note, however, that there is no definitive limits for these decisions. Spontaneous fermentations can be executed at pH 4.5 as well as at pH 3.5. The most important distinction is one’s careful attention to detail.  

To learn more about Free SO2 and its importance in winemaking, become a Bound advising client.

References 

Colantuoni, G., McLeod, S. WINEXRAY LLC. https://www.winexray.com/

Gawel, R. (1998). Red wine astringency: A review. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 4(2), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.1998.tb00137.x

Jenkins, T. W., Howe, P. A., Sacks, G. L., & Waterhouse, A. L. (2020). Determination of Molecular and “Truly” Free Sulfur Dioxide in Wine: A Comparison of Headspace and Conventional Methods. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 71(3), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2020.19052

Kallithraka, S., Bakker, J., & Clifford, M. N. (1997). Effect of pH on Astringency in Model Solutions and Wines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45(6), 2211–2216. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf960871l

Mohapatra, S. (2017). Sterilization and Disinfection. Essentials of Neuroanesthesia, 929–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805299-0.00059-2

Singleton, V. L. (1987). Oxygen with Phenols and Related Reactions in Musts, Wines, and Model Systems: Observations and Practical Implications. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 38(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1987.38.1.69

Smith, C. (2013). Postmodern Winemaking: Rethinking the Modern Science of an Ancient Craft. University of California Press.

Sotres, J., Lindh, L., & Arnebrant, T. (2011). Friction Force Spectroscopy as a Tool to Study the Strength and Structure of Salivary Films. Langmuir, 27(22), 13692–13700. https://doi.org/10.1021/la202870c

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions