Free Anthocyanins (fANT)
Figure 1. WINEXRAY's representative phenolic profile of a 21-day macerated Bordeaux varietal fermentation (The Future of Winemaking: Honoring the Vision of Professor Roger Boulton, 2022).
Free Anthocyanins (fANT) are finite and unstable monomeric pigments generally associated with wine’s purple hue. Most wines lose between 60-80% of their Free Anthocyanins within the first 100 days post-crush (WINEXRAY, Casassa & Harbertson, 2014). In Vitis vinifera, there are 6 types of free/monomeric anthocyanins, the most common of which is malvidin-3-O-glucoside. Consumers will never see the full-color potential that winemakers witness during fermentation, but what matters is what winemakers choose to do during the critical window when Free Anthocyanins are abundant, and tannins are most reactive.
On their own, Free Anthocyanins have no significant contribution to flavor or mouthfeel. Within the first several days of fermentation, peak anthocyanin extraction occurs and rapidly begins to fall. Generally, 60-80% of free anthocyanins are lost within the first 100 days post-crush primarily due to the oxidative cleavage, adsorption to lees, adsorption to bitartrate crystals, and formation of pyranoanthocyanins (WINEXRAY, Casassa & Harbertson, 2014). If winemakers are concerned with preserving color alone, then the logical decision is to barrel down and cool the wines as soon as possible, but not without consequence. The decay of free anthocyanins is inevitable as they are finite and unstable, so we concern ourselves more with stabilizing color than preserving it. The timing of this reaction is critical within the first 100 days post-crush because free anthocyanins are abundant and tannins are most reactive. The two key mechanisms to facilitate polymerization are warm temperatures above 22°C (72°F) and oxidative polymerization between 16-18°C (61-64°F). If cooled down to barrel room temperatures, about 10-15°C (50-59°F), polymerization reactions dramatically slow, and dissolved oxygen increases (WINEXRAY, Smith, 2013).
Choosing how much free anthocyanin to polymerize is a stylistic decision that mostly impacts hue. As concentrations decrease, the rate of conversion to bound anthocyanins also slows and respective concentrations become relatively stable. The rate of free anthocyanin decay will slow but continue to decrease throughout aging. A wine less than 5-10 years old will likely have a purple hue from free anthocyanins that persist in bottle, but after, only bound anthocyanins typically remain.
Even though anthocyanins contain a vicinal diphenol, they don’t participate in regenerative polymerization the same way that Iron-Reactive Phenolics do. Anthocyanin oxidation results in decay which is why we need to stabilize anthocyanins with other molecules, tannins in particular. It’s important to note that not all 6 anthocyanins are made equal. Malvidin is the most abundant, the most purple anthocyanin, and the most stable in most V. vinifera cultivars. One additional consideration is Pinot Noir and some hybrid cultivars that do not contain acylated anthocyanins (Enaru et al., 2021). Acylated anthocyanins have an additional functional group attached to their glucose molecule protecting them from glucophilic enzymes and making them more stable and soluble. As a result, non-acylated anthocyanins exacerbate color loss for already low-pigment cultivars such as Pinot Noir. Nevertheless, we can appreciate this characteristic of Pinot Noir and understand how different winemaking philosophies evolve according to each cultivar. For example, winemakers are less inclined to keep Pinot Noir warm after fermentation because bound anthocyanin formation is less effective. Fermentations also tend to be notoriously quick, so relatively little bound anthocyanin is formed at all. This is especially important for balancing tannin extraction because lower levels of bound anthocyanin enable astringency. Despite Pinot Noir’s tendency to extract low of concentrations of protein-precipitable tannins (0-600 ppm), the higher-level wines can be remarkably astringent thus posing a challenge to balance a temperamental cultivar.
For all other V. vinifera, the level of acylation is specific to cultivar, viticultural practices, and growing conditions. Once extracted into wine, free anthocyanins are subject to degradation, oxidation, precipitation, or formation of colorless compounds such as castavinols (Monagas et al., 2005). Because of their instability, we view free anthocyanins as finite and prioritize their stabilization over their preservation. At wine pH, free anthocyanins react with a variety of electrophiles and nucleophiles including other anthocyanins (via temporary copigmentation), tannins (via direct condensation and/or ethyl-bridging), lactic acid, pyruvic acid, glyoxylic acid, and a multitude of aldehydes formed by yeast during alcoholic fermentation or via free-radical oxidation of substrates such as ethanol, glycerol, tartaric acid, and malic acid (Casassa & Harbertson, 2014).
Copigmentation is an example of weak bonds that generally only persist for a year. They aren’t stable at higher alcohol levels, and at 20% ABV, they don’t occur at all (Smith, 2013). For winemakers, copigments protect free anthocyanins and facilitate bound anthocyanin formation. The consumer will never see them. Temperature accelerates polymerization and oxidation determines which type of bound anthocyanin is formed.
Finally, Free Anthocyanins do not seem to contribute significantly to mouthfeel or flavor, and they will readily bleach in the presence of sulfur dioxide (SO2). This reaction is so robust that it is the primary method of quantifying free anthocyanins. Not only do free anthocyanins bleach (and sometimes permanently), but SO2 complexed with free anthocyanins inhibits polymerization with tannins. Although SO2 bleaching can be reversed through wine aging, the anthocyanins polymerize much less efficiently after the 100-day period due to lower concentrations and temperatures. This makes delaying MLF and sulfur addition a fundamental strategy for bound anthocyanin formation (at your own risk). Furthermore, pigment-bound SO2 does not have any antimicrobial effects (Smith, 2013). This is especially troublesome for red wines because aeration-oxidation and iodine titration don’t distinguish between truly free and anthocyanin-bound SO2 (Jenkins et al., 2020). Post-malolactic fermentation, dissolved CO2, regenerative polymerization of iron-reactive phenolics, and ethyl-bridging facilitated by aldehydes are all powerful variables to protect a wine from oxidative character and build bound anthocyanins. Adding sulfur in a young wine restricts polymerization by binding free anthocyanin and aldehyde with little to no benefit to the winemaker.
To learn more about Free Anthocyanins and its importance in winemaking, become a Bound advising client.
References
Colantuoni, G., McLeod, S. WINEXRAY LLC. https://www.winexray.com/
Casassa, L. F., & Harbertson, J. F. (2014). Extraction, Evolution, and Sensory Impact of Phenolic Compounds During Red Wine Maceration. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 5(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-030713-092438
Enaru, B., Drețcanu, G., Pop, T. D., Stǎnilǎ, A., & Diaconeasa, Z. (2021). Anthocyanins: Factors Affecting Their Stability and Degradation. Antioxidants, 10(12), 1967. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10121967
Jenkins, T. W., Howe, P. A., Sacks, G. L., & Waterhouse, A. L. (2020). Determination of Molecular and “Truly” Free Sulfur Dioxide in Wine: A Comparison of Headspace and Conventional Methods. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 71(3), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2020.19052
Monagas, M., Bartolomé, B., & Gómez-Cordovés, C. (2005). Updated Knowledge About the Presence of Phenolic Compounds in Wine. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 45(2), 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690490911710
Smith, C. (2013). Postmodern Winemaking: Rethinking the Modern Science of an Ancient Craft. University of California Press.
Choose options
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Supplies
- We supply 50 mL centrifuge tubes and labels upon request.
Sample
- Sample your wine in a way that is most representative of the entire lot (i.e. practice flushing your sample valve, collecting after movements like pumpovers, stirring your barrel, etc.).
Label
- Label each sample appropriately with your Client ID, Sample Date, and Sample ID. Samples for Phenolics analysis also require a Crush Date, Varietal, and Appellation. The analysis cannot be performed without the applicable information for each sample.
- Mark the sample type. ”Juice” applies to grapes and juice samples before fermentation. ”Must” applies to samples undergoing primary fermentation. ”Wine” applies to samples after fermentation.
- Select “Standard” for our corresponding juice, must, and wine panels, or select “Phenolics” for our phenolics panel. SO2 analysis can be included with the standard panel by selecting “with SO2”. Individual parameters can be added at the bottom of the label. A full list can be found on our ANALYSES page.
Clients are able to submit samples by scheduling a pickup, delivering directly to our lab, or via the mail.
To arrange for pickup, clients must be located near Lompoc, Buellton, Santa Ynez, Goleta, or Santa Barbara and notify us by 11 am for same-day retrieval. Established clients can also use our quick scheduling function by clicking the “LAB CLIENTS” tab on the bottom right hand corner of the screen. Be sure to select the correct date and provide all necessary details including instructions for pickup or requests for sampling supplies. Please contact us for more information.
- We provide same-day results by 7 pm with a guaranteed turnaround within 24 hours of sample receipt.
- Samples that are not analyzed same-daly are refrigerated overnight and analyzed first thing the next morning.
- Results are delivered via email in PDF format and uploaded to your account.
- Our invoices are sent via email and are due upon receipt.
- Your payment is securely processed through Bound’s website using one of the most trusted e-commerce platforms in the world.
- You can also opt-in to our invoice autopay feature by clicking “SIGN UP FOR AUTOPAY” on your account page.
To ensure their stability, we ask our clients either freeze or boil their juice / fermenting wine samples before shipment. Please note that boiling or freezing your samples may influence your results and we cannot guarantee their validity. Please contact Bound with any additional questions about sample preparation before shipment. We recommend expedited same-day to one-day shipping with a tracking number included.
Frozen
Samples can be placed in a freezer 24-hours in advance and shipped with an ice pack. Do not over-fill the polypropylene tubes or use glass containers as the frozen liquid will expand and could pose a safety concern. Freezing samples is a better alternative to boiling when analyzing compounds like ethanol, volatile acidity, free sulfur, and phenolics. Label each sample as "FROZEN".
Boiled
We generally do not recommend boiling your samples as it can significantly alter the chemistry of your sample. If necessary, samples can be boiled in their 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes with a loosely fitted cap on top. Polypropylene tubes can be boiled up to 10 minutes, but be sure not to over boil as exposure to high temperatures can change your results. Label each sample as "BOILED".
Your data is completely private. Bound Lab and the services it provides are completely separate from Bound's commercial wine database.